How a litigation team turned a served discovery set into a branded, attorney-ready response shell in under ten minutes.
Outcome Snapshot
A litigation team served with written discovery faces the same bottleneck every time. Someone builds the response shell by hand, opening the firm's branded pleading paper and typing each request header above a blank response block before an attorney writes a word. That task routinely sits in a word-processing queue for days. With Inquisita, a paralegal or secretary supplies three inputs — the served requests, the firm's pleading-paper template, and the matter — and the platform returns a verified, attorney-ready shell on branded paper in under ten minutes. The word-processing hours move to billable work.
How it was done — 4-step workflow
The served discovery PDF, the firm's empty pleading-paper template, and the matter go to the platform. Inquisita reads the PDF and inventories every request and its number.
Requests inventoriedEach request is parsed by number and type (RFP, SROG, RFA, FROG), counted, and checked for subparts, gaps in numbering, and misplaced headers before anything is built.
Set parsed and countedEvery request header is placed in sequence on the firm's pleading paper, each followed by a blank response block in the firm's response style, with line numbering and formatting preserved.
Branded shell assembledSequence completeness is confirmed, the first, last, and edge-case requests are spot-read, the file is checked for corruption, and the .docx is delivered ready for the attorney's responses.
Shell delivered — attorney-ready